John Commons on pages 526-590 (Section VII) of Institutional Economics lay out a set of ideas that would be very familiar to a modern business economist. He talks about different theories related to the operation of business concerns and puts his own "money" on the idea of profit margins. Commons spends a great deal of time explaining how profit margins are key concept that drives business concerns and ultimately the business cycle. Given Commons concerns about the business cycle and unemployment, it is no surprise of his interest in this topic. He goes on to provide a great deal of evidence that profit margins are thin in general in the U.S. economy and that this thins means it takes only a few disturbances for business to be thrown into a tail spin and cause economic decline. He makes several other statements related to this including: 1) stable prices (that did not occur during the 1929-1933 depression) could have helped prevent the crash and 2) business people want to convert their uncertain profits into vested interests or monopolistic type profits as quickly as possible to protect themselves from these thin profit margins. This is a crucial aspect of Commons macroeconomics which have been ignored in the literature. more to come.......
VI. The Transactional System of Money and Value The overall objective of this section is to understand money and its role and relationship to economic value in the institutional economics of John R. Commons. Commons writes that, "It is because Value is a two-dimensional concept (omitting futurity)—with two different causations, the one being the scarcity-value, or price, determined by supply and demand, the other being the greater or smaller output of use-value which will be created in the labor process that follows the transaction. " (Commons, pg. 517, 1934). The point here is again Commons is fighting against what he observes are the limits of other definitions of economic value such as simply individual utility or the classical case of exchange value only. In this section, Commons make an important move on pages 520 and 521. He states that for a thing to be objective it needs to be independent of any objective will as opposed to other competing definitions. He will ...
Comments
Post a Comment