Schmid believed that institutional analysis must include knowledge, psychology and power. He took some of these original ideas from Vilifredo Paerto's writing. Schmid states that neoclassical economics has been very narrowly focused on knowledge via knowing cost and productions functions and psychology via use of the consumer utility function. He states that power is rarely if ever addressed in neoclassical economics and the only real issue of concern is monopoly power and concentration of the ownership of resources. Schmid believes that human interdedpendence is much richer and more interconnected that simply monopoly power. his analysis will focus on the issue of power because it has been neglected in traditional analysis. Schmid also wants to expand our understanding of how knowledge and psychology are used in analysis. He writes that "rights and rules govern access to and use of power" (pg. 6)
VI. The Transactional System of Money and Value The overall objective of this section is to understand money and its role and relationship to economic value in the institutional economics of John R. Commons. Commons writes that, "It is because Value is a two-dimensional concept (omitting futurity)—with two different causations, the one being the scarcity-value, or price, determined by supply and demand, the other being the greater or smaller output of use-value which will be created in the labor process that follows the transaction. " (Commons, pg. 517, 1934). The point here is again Commons is fighting against what he observes are the limits of other definitions of economic value such as simply individual utility or the classical case of exchange value only. In this section, Commons make an important move on pages 520 and 521. He states that for a thing to be objective it needs to be independent of any objective will as opposed to other competing definitions. He will ...
Comments
Post a Comment